Calorie Restriction Reduces Disease and Extends Life

In literally thousands of experiments, on a wide range of animals (almost certainly to include humans!), calorie restriction has greatly extended maximum and average lifespans and improved disease resistance, including resistance to many cancers. There is still uncertainty about why calorie restriction has these desired effects. Two important reasons proposed for the benefits of calorie restriction are: 1) fewer calories mean that there will be a reduction in the accumulation of oxidant and free-radical damage, and 2) fewer calories alter fat deposition, obesity, and hormones. The practical effect of this is improve the immune response of calorie-restricted (hereafter CR) animals.

There are numerous reputable websites to learn more about the underlying animal studies (preliminary corroborative results are now coming out on the rhesus monkey experiments currently underway). Indeed, there are already convincing studies demonstrating the health benefits (and, no doubt, the longevity benefits…though not enough time has passed to observe these!) in humans.

For present purposes, that CR—with adequate or optimal nutrition (the first controversy)–is good for your prospects for a long, healthy life will be taken as a given. The science is unambiguous and the life extension benefits have been known (surprisingly) since 1935. The interesting questions revolve around related issues.

What is Calorie Restriction?

You might (in an ideal world) want to get an extensive blood test, so that you can verify for yourself the benefits of CR as they occur. Also, in an ideal world, you would want to calculate how many calories you are currently eating. This will add some useful precision, if others are to learn from your experience with CR—remember that you are a pioneer and that leaving a record is a good thing. But, unfortunately, I did not do the latter, so I have only a loose understanding of what percentage of CR I am engaged in at any particular time.

The range of recommended calorie restriction levels is from 10% to 25% from the unrestricted diet (Walford believes most people should start CR with 1,800 to 2,200 calories per day). But, you don’t want to lose too much weight and you don’t want to lose it too fast! A number of ways of thinking about CR have emerged. If you feel weak, lightheaded, or are overly tired and sleep a lot, you are either losing too fast or not getting enough nutrition with your reduced caloric intake—you should feel better, not worse, if things are going right.

To give a reference, it would be difficult for most people to lose more than a pound a week of true weight (ignoring water) in a healthy way. Since a pound loss (3500 calories, roughly) in a week breaks down to 500 calories per day, that is a quite substantial restriction (16.7% CR if one is initially at 3,000 calories a day, which is plenty of food). Note that the “Percent Daily Values” on all of the food packages these days refer to a 2,000-calorie diet, with gram numbers also being given for the 2,500 calorie diet. If you were eating at those levels before restriction, losing one pound a week would be 25% and 20% CR respectively.

So, you are “safer” to take six weeks to lose 6 pounds, though this, too, is likely to vary with the individual. When I lost 12 pounds in that time (2 per week), I felt very bad, but Ray (another CR Society member) lost 15 pounds in 6 weeks and felt fine. The key is to be guided by how you feel–you are supposed to feel better, not worse. If you feel worse, lose more slowly. Remember that when you are losing fat you are also losing muscle along with that fat; you may also be releasing toxins stored in fat too rapidly.

Also, and especially if you are moderately to very active, you will find your fat percentage declining steadily as you lose weight. Walford believes that you should not let that fall below 6-10% for men and 10-15% for women. This is not terribly likely to happen for most people on CR—the 1990 mean values for males between 40 and 75 years old varied from 25.3 to 26.8% while the female means were 34.9 to 39.0% for those age groups! For men between 40 and 75, a 13 to16% body fat will put you in the lowest 5% of the nation, while for women, a 25 to 28% body fat will also make them leaner than 19 out of 20 people!

And, we’ve gotten a bit fatter since 1990. So, it’s not too likely that you will acquire a dangerously low fat percentage. Despite Walford’s warning, having quite low body fat percentages may not be so terribly undesirable at least for particular individuals (Frank Shorter was estimated to be only 1-3% fat when he won the Olympic marathon in 1972!).

A rough measure of how fat people are is the Body Mass Index or BMI. This can be calculated by dividing your weight in kilograms (2.2 pounds to a kilogram) by the square of your height in meters (39.4 inches to a meter). Thus, if you weigh 150 lbs. (68.2kg) at a height of 5’9″ (69″ or 1.75m) tall and weigh 150 lbs., your BMI is 68.2kg/3.0625 = 22.3. Traditional nutrition/health sources say that the BMI for “normal” men and women should be in the range of 20-27, which roughly corresponded to the 10th and 75th percentile values in 1971-74. For a flavor of where you stand, from 1990 data (we’ve gotten fatter since then!)

Women generally have lower BMIs, except among the very obese, where there are more women than men. The reconciliation of these BMI data with the earlier data that indicated that women have higher fat percentages (true at every BMI) than men comes via the greater amount of lean body mass among men. I would guess that the average BMI of the members of the CR Society (a newsgroup on the web) would be well under 21, with many as low as 17. A recent study has indicated that those with lower BMIs are much healthier and less prone to disease and premature death than those with high BMIs.

While perhaps a depressing revelation for many, it turns out that you do not get CR’s health benefits by losing weight via increased caloric expenditure. It is true that a typical person could lose 1 pound a week either by restricting calories an average of 500 per day or by running 5 miles every day (losing an average of 100 calories per mile more-or-less regardless of speed) and eating the original number of calories.

The reason exercise does not give CR benefits even if it gave equivalent CR weight stems from how CR is hypothesized to work. Food is the source of 90% of the oxidants or free radicals in the body—reducing food reduces oxidative damage. Exercise, ironically, actually contributes to free radical formation by burning that food faster. These negative effects are for most people (the non-CRers) more than offset by the health benefits of exercise, so that average lifespan is certainly increased by exercise. [Probably the oxidative damage is more than offset by positive effects of improved fat deposition, reduced obesity, and improved hormone status.] But a number of rodent experiments indicate that exercise doesn’t add anything to the maximum lifespan and fairly little to the average lifespan when animals are already calorie restricted.

It is the CR that gives the benefits—exercise to feel better and to maintain independence in old age, but don’t exercise as a substitute for calorie restriction. Note, too, that while CR won’t make you stronger, it will make you relatively stronger—you’ll be able to do more push-ups and chin-ups, for example, just because you have less weight to lift! These benefits will be manifest in everything you do as you move around in your lighter body throughout the day.

33 thoughts on “Calorie Restriction Reduces Disease and Extends Life

  1. Pingback: Baby wicker basket

  2. Pingback: leaf vacuum

  3. Pingback: Polar fleece beanies

  4. Pingback: camera tripod

  5. Oh joyous day yes. This is the one reason I was born. To find you, my long lost knowledge seeking soul-mate.

  6. Pingback: Patio table lazy susan

  7. Pingback: Xg 550 gas scooter

  8. Pingback: Holly ridge golf course nc

  9. You’ve definitely a interest personal posting style and offer extremely information. The articles are good to understand and you don´t use a lot ofa ads like all the other bloggers.

  10. I happen to be surfing on-line a lot more than 3 hours these days, however I never uncovered any interesting post like yours. It really is pretty worth ample for me. In my viewpoint, if all webmasters and bloggers created superior content material as you did, the internet will probably be a lot more beneficial than ever just before.

  11. Nice! I am quite interested in your site. If I were to use this website, I could earn you 100-200 USD daily. I am willing to work on monetizing your site, on the condition that you share 50% of revenues with me. If you are interested, please send me an email. 😀

  12. This is an awesome post, I’ll be adding this site to my bookmarks 😀

  13. Pingback: ball pit balls in bulk

  14. Pingback: king futon

  15. whatsup, clicked from yahoo to your page and it displayed funny but after refresh site displayed good. Just thought id let you know and keep up the good work

  16. Pingback: smartwool socks

  17. Nice! I am quite interest in your site. If I using this website, I can earn 100-200 USD daily. I can cooperate with you on the condition that you share 50% revenue with me. If you are interested,please email for me. 😉

  18. please, do an update con what’s in my purse (for? summer time)

  19. This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I enjoy seeing websites that understand the value of providing a prime resource for free. I truly loved reading your post. Thanks!

  20. Surprise! You definitely covered this subject well. Are there other options that i will need to check out?

  21. I am just making a blog related to this. If you allow, I would like to use some of your content. And with full refernce of course. Thanks in advance.

  22. Cool, thanks lots,I have to comment that your site is amazing! 😉

  23. Hi there I have troubles adding this blog page to my RSS reader. My browser is Konqueror, could that be causing the trouble?

  24. My suggestions is take any unsolicited advice having a grain of salt. If you have not ask for advice from somebody pay no attention to it. People have a tendency to want to usually voice their thoughts even when not request for or wanted. Try to recognize that their opinions, thoughts, ideas and suggestions doesn’t matter.. all that matters is what you believe about yourself. Even if it is someone you love very much and they suggestions you about something that make you really feel bad, tell them how it makes you really feel and why. Should you request someone for suggestions and also you don’t like points they advised, you will just need to consider it and do with it that which you want. Except it or let it go. It is always your call what to accomplish with anyones advice. Most individuals do not mean to hurt your feelings. They truly believe what they are telling you is in your greatest interest. Just believe about it like that and do that which you would do anyway regardless of the things say.

  25. I have visited your site before. It’s Great! IMHO you have a informative blog

  26. Great website, I recently came across it and I am already a fan. I recently dropped 30 pounds in thirty days, and I want to share my weight loss success with as many people as possible. If I can lose the weight then any one can. Whatever you do, never quit and you WILL attain every one of your weight loss targets!

  27. Obesity is a serious health condition that can interfere with basic physical functions such as breathing or walking. Those who are morbidly obese are at greater risk for illnesses including diabetes, high blood pressure, sleep apnea, gastroesophageal reflux disease (gerd), gallstones, osteoarthritis, heart disease, and cancer. Morbid obesity is diagnosed by determining. Bmi is defined by the ratio of an individual’s height to his or her weight. Normal bmi ranges from 20-25. See bmi on back panel. An individual is considered morbidly obese if he or she is 100 pounds over his/her ideal body weight, has a bmi of 40 or more, or 35 or more and experiencing obesity-related health conditions, such as high blood pressure or diabetes. Obesity-related health conditions.

  28. Obesity is a body mass index of 30 or more, corresponding to a person 5 feet 4 inches tall and weighing 174 pounds, or 5 feet 10 inches tall and weighing 209 pounds or more. “these findings have enormous implications for the nation’s health care system because treatment rates for diabetes, hypertension, and other chronic problems are several times higher among severely obese individuals than among the moderately obese,” sturm said. “with these growth rates, accommodating severely obese patients in clinical practice will no longer be an unusual occurrence,” sturm said. “doctors, hospitals and other health providers must be prepared to treat these people on a regular basis. This may require a substantial investment in new equipment. The rand study, published in the october 13 issue of the. Archives of internal medicine. , was based on the behavioral risk factor surveillance survey. The world’s largest telephone survey, it is conducted by the centers for disease control and prevention and tracks health risks in the united states. Height and weight is based on self-reporting. 5 million respondents were included in the analysis.

  29. Holla

    This is like my morning coffee, I mean your website, I’ve been an ignorant on so many topics but thanks to you I learned much. Funny how I believe something and then I discover that the reality is totally different. Your articles are great to say the least. I love, love, love your blog! I love the way you write your articles by the way, you’ve done an excellent job with your website!

    So long!

  30. Pingback: Anti-Aging – Fact or Fiction | Anti-Aging Guide

  31. Pingback: Anti-Aging – Fact or Fiction | Anti-Aging Guide

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *