The official line is still there is no treatment for COVID-19, so half the population and most politicians are waiting for a vaccine to come in to save the day even though the long-term side effects are unknown. No vaccine is needed for an easily treated disease, and the cover-up of this fact is damming. It is a terrible crime.
It is cruel beyond all reason to perpetuate medical ignorance, and those that do should be put away for a long time for medical murder. There are many treatments for COVID (April 1st), but this essay is going to concentrate on two of the prize winners that, when combined, will cover all the bases, prevention, mild symptoms, severe infection, and hospitalized patients in ICU whose lives are on the line.
This combination of one pharmaceutical and one natural agent will run circles around any vaccine that comes out because no vaccine treats the already seriously ill. Once a person is headed for the hospital, vaccine efficacy drops to zero. With these two agents in play, no vaccine will be needed, meaning governments are wasting their money and playing Nazi-style medicine. They will be experimenting on their populations with dangerous vaccines with unknown side-effects.
There is an increasing and rapidly emerging evidence base supporting the drug ivermectin’s efficacy in the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. The authors come from reputable institutions like The University of Texas Health Science Center and the Eastern Virginia Medical School, so consider their analysis to be trustworthy.
By analyzing existing studies, they found Ivermectin is;
a. 60% effective in late treatment,
b. 91% effective in early treatment,
c. 98% effective in pre-exposure prophylaxis, and
d. 87% effective in post-exposure prophylaxis.
There was a video where Dr. Chris Martenson reviewed the study and component studies and gave his analysis of Ivermectin. He concluded it was medical malpractice not to use it for COVID. Unfortunately, if you go to Youtube, which I now consider a terrorist organization, you will read: This video has been removed for violating YouTube’s Terms of Service. Here is the video reposted in its entirety on Vimeo.
But YouTube will not have the audacity to censor the following video because it is official testimony in a Senate hearing where a credible doctor and a large medical organization behind him are declaring Ivermectin as a miracle drug for COVID. He is not using that word lightly.
Pierre Kory, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center, delivers emotional testimony during the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing. “Here is the near “miraculous” solution to COVID-19 that should resolve all the divisions. How can anyone (except those who care only for profit) disagree,” he says?
Ivermectin is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antiparasitic drug used to treat several neglected tropical diseases, including onchocerciasis, helminthiases, and scabies. It is also being evaluated for its potential to reduce malaria transmission by killing mosquitoes that feed on treated humans and livestock. For these indications, Ivermectin has been widely used and has demonstrated an excellent safety profile, according to the NIH.
Ivermectin acts by inhibiting the host importin alpha/beta-1 nuclear transport proteins, which are part of a critical intracellular transport process that viruses hijack to enhance infection by suppressing the host antiviral response. Ivermectin is, therefore, a host-directed agent, which is likely the basis for its broad-spectrum activity in vitro against the viruses that cause dengue, Zika, HIV, and yellow fever.
A collaborative study led by the Biomedicine Discovery Institute (BDI) of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, with the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity (Doherty Institute), showed that Ivermectin has antiviral activity, in in vitro testing, against the virus that causes COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2).
In an article published in the journal Antiviral Research they explained, “To test the antiviral activity of Ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2, we infect the cells and then add Ivermectin. The supernatant and cell granules were harvested on days 0-3 and analyzed for RNA replication of the new coronavirus. At 24 hours, there was a 93% reduction in viral RNA present in the supernatant (indicative of released virions) of samples treated with Ivermectin.”
After eight months of active clinical observation and attending about 7 thousand patients of Covid-19 in three medical centers located in Puerto Plata, La Romana, and Punta Cana, Dr. José Natalio Redondo revealed that 99.3% of the symptomatic patients who received care in his emergency services, including the use of Ivermectin, managed to recover in the first five days of recorded symptoms.
But sure, roll up your sleeve and take your loved ones to get vaccinated, but before you do, look at what the FDA thinks might happen to you and your family.
Even the mainstream press, CNBC, is putting out warnings saying, “Doctors say CDC should warn people the side effects from Covid vaccine shots won’t be a walk in the park.”
To give you an idea of how delusional politicians can be about the coming vaccines, listen to the warped thoughts of the mayor of New York City. “The pandemic, as terrible as it has been, is a temporary disaster that should begin to resolve itself with the imminent approval of a vaccine, allowing New York’s economy to return to its previous healthy state. Do you believe De Blasio?
The scorching news is:
The FDA announced this week that two trial participants have died after receiving their coronavirus vaccine, according to Reuters. According to U.S. regulators’ report on the shot, four people who got Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine in the firm’s trial developed Bell’s palsy, a form of temporary facial paralysis as reported by the Daily Mail.
One of the deceased was reportedly immunocompromised. This information was obtained from documents released on Tuesday ahead of an upcoming emergency approval meeting on Thursday. The FDA announced that currently there is not enough research to guarantee the vaccine’s safety for immunocompromised groups, pregnant women, and children–yet it is still expected to gain approval on Thursday the 10th of December and is already being rolled out across the UK.
Natural Medicines are Safer and Just as Effective
Some of us are averse to taking pharmaceuticals even when the boys at NIH say they have excellent safety records. They say that about all vaccines, even with billions paid out for vaccine damages over the years. However, most people are not averse to taking a drug.
Vitamin D is better, safer than vaccines. It is more affordable to society with no side-effects, no risk, no need for intense refrigeration, no mask or lock-downs needed. Vitamin D Insufficiency May Account for Almost Nine of Ten COVID-19 Deaths: “Evidence from observational studies is “, suggesting that the majority of deaths due to SARS-CoV-2 infections are statistically attributable to vitamin D insufficiency and could potentially be prevented by vitamin D supplementation.”
You can see this in English, with complete information from Lorenz Borsche and Dr. Bernd Glauner, from Germany. It’s clear, no death from the coronavirus at vitamin D blood concentrations above 34 ng/ml.
The Guardian published that scientists are calling for ministers in England to add vitamin D to common foods such as bread and milk to help the fight against Covid-19. Low levels of vitamin D may lead to a greater risk of catching the coronavirus or suffering more severe effects of infection, according to some studies. Researchers in Spain recently found that 82% of coronavirus patients out of 216 admitted to hospital had low vitamin D levels.
In the National Library of Medicine, we read that A Single Large Dose of Vitamin D Could be Used as a Means of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Prevention and Treatment. It has been shown that low Vit D level is associated with a viral infection, and Vit D supplementation is beneficial for people infected with viruses, such as HIV and hepatitis C virus. Although COVID-19 is a respiratory disease, the morbidity and mortality of this disease are driven by coagulopathy. Clinical studies have shown that Vit D can exert anticoagulant effects. Vit D, a lipid-soluble vitamin, can be administered as a draught. Vit D supplementation is safe and has rare toxic events. In addition, the cost of Vit D is fairly low. Based on these observations, we speculate that a single dose of 300,000 IU Vit D may have a role in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
One study on vitamin D used as high as 540,000 units for severe lung disease. High dose vitamin D administration in ventilated intensive care unit patients has also been studied using 50,000 IU vitamin D3 or 100,000 IU vitamin D3 daily for 5 consecutive days (total vitamin D3 dose = 250,000 IU or 500,000 IU, respectively) without an cause for alarm.
One company in the USA makes tablets that are 50,000 and recommended as high as four a day (200,000 units for four days) for at risk patients. Now because of the FDA oppression they will not make such recommendations.
According to the Mayo Clinic: Vitamin D toxicity, characterized by hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and suppression of parathyroid hormone, is usually observed when intakes are excessively high, in the range of more than 50,000 to 1 million IU of vitamin D per day and are maintained long-term for several months to years. Meaning a cancer patient, who is desperately trying to reverse their spreading cancer, could safely take 500,000 units a day for first week, 400,000 units for second week, 300,000 units for third week and 50,000 units a day from there after without even touching the toxicity of any form of chemotherapy.
Taking one 50,000 IU capsule of Vitamin D3 every two weeks will result in 80% of adults bringing their blood levels to above 40 nanograms/ millliliter, an optimal level for good health. A 50,000 IU capsule is the equivalent of amount of vitamin D from sunbathing for 3 days in a sunny climate. The skin produces approximately 10,000 IU vitamin D in response to 20–30 minutes of full body summer sun exposure—50 times more than the US government’s recommendation of 200 IU per day.
Vitamin D – Increased Immune System Strength
Thousands of studies over the past fifty years have informed the public about the positive relationship between vitamin D, sun exposure and the immune system. COVID-19 is being treated wrongly due to a serious diagnosis error and because world health officials do not listen to doctors on the front lines and because since forever they have been dead set against natural medicines, even if they are used every day in ICU departments. It is helpful to read about doctors most recommended treatments.
Vitamin D has a prominent role in the body’s innate immunity as it is important in the maintenance of macrophages and monocytes and its function in defending against infections. Anything that helps strengthen our immune system is going to be helpful in our fight against cancer.
Research findings which show that vitamin D can speed up antibiotic treatment of tuberculosis (TB) have been revealed by scientists at The London School of Medicine and Dentistry. The study — which gives fresh insight into how vitamin D may affect the immune response was published January 6, 2011 in The Lancet. Scientists have shown that a single 2.5mg dose of vitamin D may be enough to boost the immune system to fight against tuberculosis (TB) and similar bacteria for at least 6 weeks. Their findings came from a study that identified an extraordinarily high incidence of vitamin D deficiency amongst those communities in London most at risk from the disease, which kills around two million people each year
Sunshine is healthy for us and our immune systems. The sun’s ultraviolet rays, or UV rays as they are commonly known, are needed by our bodies to produce vitamin D. Vitamin D is essential, as it helps keep our immune systems strong, as well as helping to strengthen bone and muscle. Sunshine also helps improve our general mood.
Sun exposure has been demonized by dermatologists. They prefer you cover up with solar protectors whose chemicals are now officially known to get into users blood streams. The sun and vitamin D are essential if you want to avoid cancer yet mainstream medicine suggests you avoid the sun and increase your chances of coming down with cancer.
In the winter, the sun in Britain is barely strong enough
to make the vitamin, and by spring, say scientists, 60% of the population
is deficient (defined as a blood level below 30 ng per millilitre).
For most people today the answer is no, you are not getting enough vitamin D which is the same thing as saying most people are not getting enough sun. A new study has found that the number of people being diagnosed with vitamin D deficiency has tripled from 2008 to 2010 in the United States. Some researchers believe that up to 75% of the United States population may not be getting enough vitamin D (levels below 30 ng/ml). This is an expanding problem, especially for children who are spending most of their time in the digital world instead of playing outside.
Source for Story: